Write method statements that actually score.
Build structured method statements mapped directly to the tender's quality and evaluation criteria. Turn how you'll deliver the work into a response that wins the technical marks, not just a document that ticks a box.
Great delivery plans lose marks when the writing isn't structured.
Your team knows how to build the job. But the quality submission is often written under deadline pressure, copied from the last bid, and disconnected from the actual evaluation criteria. Marks get left on the table not because the approach is wrong, but because the response doesn't clearly answer what's being scored.
The Method Statement builder gives you a structured workspace to set out approach, sequencing, resources and controls against the tender's quality criteria. Each section maps to what the evaluator is marking, so the response stays focused and complete.
Because it lives in the same workspace as your scope, risks and programme, the method statement stays consistent with the rest of the bid and the delivery commitments carry through to the Handover Pack when you win.
Mapped to evaluation criteria
Structure each section against the tender's quality criteria so nothing the evaluator is marking gets missed.
Consistent with the bid
Approach, sequencing and resources stay aligned with your scope, risks and programme in one workspace.
Reusable structure
Start from a consistent framework instead of a blank page or last bid's copy-paste.
Delivery continuity
The committed method carries through to the Handover Pack so the site team delivers what was promised.